Sheffield’s Controversial Minicab Signage Proposal Faces Backlash
- Published 25 days ago
- Private Hire
- Sheffield
Sheffield City Council's proposal to introduce permanent signage on private hire vehicles has raised concerns about safety and vehicle damage among taxi drivers.

Sheffield City Council's controversial plan to require permanent signage on private hire vehicles (PHVs) has sparked strong opposition from the taxi trade union. The proposal, which would affect vehicles such as minicabs booked through services like Uber, has been described as "expensive and reckless" by the GMB union.
Nasar Raoof, the taxi trade representative for the GMB in Yorkshire, expressed concerns that the plan could confuse the public, increase the risk of abuse against drivers, and damage vehicles. He argued that permanent signage could make it difficult for drivers to sell their vehicles in the future. Raoof added:
"They don't need to be permanent, unless the council is wishing to take on the cost of damage and repair to the vehicle. It is a draconian measure, and it is not proportionate."
The proposal, in line with the Department for Transport’s best practice guidance, would only apply to private hire vehicles, not traditional street-hailing taxis. It aims to standardize signage across the industry, with a focus on improving safety and visibility. However, Raoof, a former taxi driver, emphasized that the move could result in unwanted attention for drivers, particularly when they are off duty. He pointed out that some drivers have faced verbal and physical abuse during incidents, such as riots in August, and that the proposal could escalate these safety concerns. He said:
"The plan would mean being identified as a driver even when you're off duty with your family. There will be huge consequences."
The union has garnered significant support, with more than 300 signatures on a petition calling for the plan to be dropped. Petitioners have reported incidents where drivers had eggs and stones thrown at their vehicles, which they believe could increase with the new regulations. Supporters are advocating for the use of non-permanent, magnetic signage instead, a solution they feel would address safety concerns without the negative consequences of permanent labels.
Councillor Joe Otten, chair of the waste and street scene policy committee, said:
"Our job now is to analyse what people have told us, both taxi drivers and the people who use taxis. We will bring a report on the findings to the council's waste and street scene committee in early June."
The Department for Transport has provided guidance, suggesting that councils should avoid imposing unnecessary requirements beyond displaying an authority licence plate and a "pre-booked only" sign on the door. While the Sheffield City Council plan is still under review, the ongoing debate highlights the tension between regulation and the practical needs of PHV drivers.
Latest Taxi Updates!
Headlines, Breaking News, and Top Guides—straight to you! Stay informed and ride smarter every day!
About The Author
